View Single Post
01-28-2011, 12:44 AM
HFB Partner
Zad's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: OC
Country: United States
Posts: 11,919
vCash: 500
I am amused by people who credit Moulson's success primarily to John Tavares and then claim he was not worth keeping. This is a discussion being had elsewhere. The position is self contradictory. If one is claiming Moulson is a 30 goal scorer because of Tavares' abilities at center, then how can one advocate he would not have had the same success here with a better center like Kopitar? The logical answer is that Matt is talented, has broken through with playing time, has benefited from playing with a solid center and there is no reason to believe he would not have had the same success here if given the same opportunity.

Zad is offline