Thread: Proposal: Min-NYR
View Single Post
Old
01-31-2011, 05:09 PM
  #58
MK9
Registered User
 
MK9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Andover, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 1,515
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pld459666 View Post
Minnesota trading Burns makes no sense now that he is playing like the defenceman they were hoping to get when they shifted him from RW to D. He's finally playing a physical brand of hockey (that may actually turn out to be a bad thing with his concussion history)
He was playing that way in '07-'08. So makes more sense to say he's finally playing that way...again. And he's had 1. One. ONE concussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pld459666 View Post
That package of QUALITY youth is moved for legit superstar players in their primes. Not a player like Brent Burns who while a good player in his own right, has had serious concussion issues and is not a superstar player.
Jesus Christ on a crutch. It never ends.

MK9 is offline   Reply With Quote