View Single Post
Old
07-12-2005, 11:39 AM
  #16
Fletch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 21,469
vCash: 500
To me...

it makes perfect sense, which is why I'd be shocked if that's the way it eventually ends up. The salary cap should be based on what a team spends, and not what's on their roster. The Rangers can trade-away Holik tomorrow, eat 3/4 of his salary and get something decent in return, and thus take advantage of their large capital base. That's why we're in this problem, to stop guys like the Rangers from spending too much.

Fletch is offline