View Single Post
02-02-2011, 06:22 PM
quoipourquoi's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Country: United States
Posts: 4,684
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by reckoning View Post
Vancouver ('97-'98 to '99-'00):
With Messier: 71-103-33; .423
Without Messier: 7-24-8; .282
That might be my new favorite statistic. I had my suspicions based upon the way the Canucks fell apart in the 1999-2000 season, but this confirms it.

Originally Posted by Media Savvy Lee
Despite this super lineup, the 1992 Rangers fared no better in the postseason than the 1990 team. In fact, the 1990 team did not have the benefit of Leetch, yet had an easier time in the postseason than the 1992 Rangers, who were a mess in the postseason despite a super stacked lineup
If it weren't for the strike that kept the Rangers off the ice for 18 days, I think they would've had a fair deal more momentum going into the playoffs.

quoipourquoi is offline   Reply With Quote