View Single Post
02-03-2011, 09:54 PM
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,569
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by nyr2k2 View Post
This logic fails because disappointing losses at home and not showing up until the third period have been constants for this team, even when they're playing well. If this was a new phenomenon, something that started when the injuries began, I'd buy it...but that's not the case.

We've seen that the team is capable of working hard for a full 60 minutes. Why does it happen so infrequently? Working hard like that will lead us to overachieving in the standings. But we don't do it with any kind of consistency, so it pisses some of us off.
You may not subscribe to it but there's nothing wrong with that logic. We're not a 1 seed we HAVE severely overperformed which is why something like this has been a constant. It's really not flawed at all. We now have no 1st line which doesn';t help but any1 watching tonight saw this is a team in bad need of some more experience and work. DUnno how any1 argues that this team does not need time to get back into step

JimmyStart* is offline   Reply With Quote