View Single Post
02-10-2011, 07:35 AM
Join Date: Dec 2006
Originally Posted by
which is exactly what you are doing.
Fact: Vanek can't play the way he has been playing lately...with Roy. Vanek and Ruff have both admitted as much.
I don't think the team is BETTER without Roy. I think the team is the same with or without him.
BUT...Vanek IS BETTER without Roy.
The 2nd bolded is just an acknowledgement of you having your own bias.
it can't be just luck that three of our struggling wingers start producing when Roy is out.
I don't say that the team is better without roy. But I'd say Roy doesn't make this team better.
It seems that vanek and miller have a way bigger impact to the team than roy has.
Another point of view:
If Roy is out, the other seem to think the game is up to them.
when roy is in the lineup the others might think thats up to roy....
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Luceni