View Single Post
02-14-2011, 05:06 PM
#18
LAK1ngs
Registered User

Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
vCash: 500
If I wasn't at work, I'd try to figure this out. I'd like to see how the standings would change with this system.

I went and did our Div:

ANA [(28 x 3) = 84 (4 x 2) = 8 (2 x 1) = 2] = 94
DAL [(26 x 3) = 78 (5 x 2) = 10 (4 x 1) = 4] = 92
SJ [(27 x 3) = 81 (3 x 2) = 6 (2 x 1) = 2] = 89
LA [(25 x 3) = 75 (6 x 2) = 12 (1 x 1) = 1] = 88
Pho [(26 x 3) = 78 (3 x 2) = 6 (3 x 1) = 3] = 87

I hope my lazy math is correct.

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mbar The idea that a shootout (gimmick) win is the equivalent of a true victory in regulation is the problem. They are not equivalent. Nor is losing in a gimmick the equivalent to losing in regulation. Any point system that doesn't recognize this fact is horribly flawed. The current point system is flawed but at least it doesn't punish a team for failing in the shootout by punishing them with 0 points even though they were the equal of the opposition in the actual hockey game. The only fair solution which keeps shootouts is the 3-2-1-0 system. 3 points for a real/OT win 2 points for a shootout win 1 point for shootout loss 0 points for a real/OT loss. So obvious a caveman could come up with it. But will never happen.

Last edited by LAK1ngs: 02-14-2011 at 05:19 PM.