HFBoards - View Single Post

two out of three* · 02-17-2011, 05:42 PM

B is the obvious choice.

Bernier will eventually (and if the team didn't play like garbage in front of them, he could already be better than Quick THIS year) be better than Quick.

I am not a Brown fan at all... Its all about value with Brown. Simmonds is a better all around hockey player especially when you factor in the development process. Oh.. And obviously.. if you swap Simmonds with Loktionov is group B.. Its a no brainer.

Schenn will mean more to this team than Anze Kopitar. Even IF Brayden goes through a scoring slump (inevitable) like Kopitar is.. At the very he least he won't be as SOFT as Kopitar. He'll probably end up being way better defensively as well.

And obviously Doughty > Johnson.

02-17-2011, 05:42 PM	#73
two out of three* Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Newbury Park, CA Country: Posts: 4,829 vCash: 500	B is the obvious choice. Bernier will eventually (and if the team didn't play like garbage in front of them, he could already be better than Quick THIS year) be better than Quick. I am not a Brown fan at all... Its all about value with Brown. Simmonds is a better all around hockey player especially when you factor in the development process. Oh.. And obviously.. if you swap Simmonds with Loktionov is group B.. Its a no brainer. Schenn will mean more to this team than Anze Kopitar. Even IF Brayden goes through a scoring slump (inevitable) like Kopitar is.. At the very he least he won't be as SOFT as Kopitar. He'll probably end up being way better defensively as well. And obviously Doughty > Johnson.