View Single Post
02-19-2011, 01:11 PM
I Am Chariot
One shift at a time
I Am Chariot's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 14,492
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Ola View Post
Chariot, there is one reason and one reason for it only.

Our worthless transition game. We look exactly like Atlanta for example did against us in the PO's when we swept them. When IK and Hossa were invisible for 4 straight games.

Torts gameplan is just flawed.

This is the problem
-We get the puck deep in our own end. The order from the coach is then to head up ice ASAP.
-Our D's make a long pass up ice, often to one of our wingers.
-The player that gets the puck, is often the one forward we have the highest up ice.
-That puck is re-directed by the winger into the attacking-zone, and our winger is then often hits by a D.
= Whats the result?
-The puck is at the endboards.
1. We have one winger at the attacking blueline, who is slowed down by a hit.
2. We have a center and another winger basically at the redline heading up ice.
3. We have two D's in our own zone, heading up ice.
Our forward with the puck just gets completely isolated high up ice. It's the textbook book flaw with playing pre-lockout hockey in the post lockout game. It does not matter how hard we work, we will just not be able to get a hold of the other team.

The positive is that we do not give away pucks in the neutralzone. This system is designed to break traps. You can not really trap against a team like that. Not NJD 1995 type of trap at least. People say that NJD trapped last night. They actually did not. Lemiere just put a D in the corner in his defensive zone, and when we re-directed a long pass into the attacking zone, we had no chance to put pressure on NJD's D. They already fetched the puck when we crossed the attacking blueline.

We give up possesion by design.

If we play against a team that keeps the possesion of the puck -- the momentumgame is basically lost on forehand.

If we face a team that:
1. Trys to play a puckpossesion game, but
2. fails at doing so. Struggles. Plays sloppy. Makes misstakes.
=Then we will eat them up.

But when we face a team that does not shoot themselfs in the foot, then we are screwed basically.

Why continue with the periphery once in their zone. It would seem like a little tweak to that scheme on the other end would be better

I Am Chariot is offline   Reply With Quote