Where do you stand on the youth movement and the current state of the union
View Single Post
02-20-2011, 03:17 PM
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York
Originally Posted by
It's about continuity. You think Dubinsky-Anisimov-Callahan is a bonafide first line? NO. But it's amazing what happens when they have some consistency isn't it?
Zuccarello was one of our best players an works his tail off (which apparently is all Torts wants) and yet his ice time has been limited a ton lately. Avery as well.
And yes, shame on Eminger for being shaky in is FOUR MINUTES OF ICE TIME AFTER BEING SCRATCHED FOR 2 STRAIGHT WEEKS.
It's no wonder the people who attempt to defend Torts are just as clueless.
Yeah, call me clueless if you think STEVE EMINGER is a big reason we're losing. Please.
Avery and Zuc are being given ample time to be successful. Avery works his ass off, but guess what? His playmaking skills come in flashes and his goal-scoring ability is pathetic.
And you think breaking up the Pack line is the reason we're losing? Again, please. That should be our second line. You keep playing them like a 1st line and we'd STILL be losing. Not to mention, Cally had been injured for a while and the Pack line has not been broken up purposely as much as you'd like to argue.
Please, don't call me ****ing clueless when this is entirely arguable and you're obviously anti-Torts, when there's a reason he does what he does.
edit- And are you really saying this 3rd period is what happens when he "lets the best players play?" Jesus christ, this is the most opinionated argument i've ever seen, and yet you call me clueless. Yet i'm sure during this entire strech of heartbreaking 1 goal losses because OUR BEST GUYS (Dubinsky, Anisimov, W2-Step-Zuc line) haven't been able to convert on golden opportunities, he was playing "our best guys."
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by BlueshirtBlitz