View Single Post
Old
02-21-2011, 05:25 PM
  #49
Grannys
Registered User
 
Grannys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London, UK
Country: Finland
Posts: 3,032
vCash: 500
If there ends up being no move that this led to, I will be pissed. Hagman was not producing to his best ability for the Flames thats true but you need all the pieces you can get once it comes to the stretch and the playoffs. A player like Hagman has the experience and character to be a key member of the team if we get into the post season.

There better be a move coming or maybe Feaster planned to waive him, knowing most likely no one will pick him up. Then bring him back but with a little extra cap space to bring in some other pieces also?

If its just to get rid of Hagman and thats it. This is quite a dumb move. No one in the minors has the experience that Hagman has.

Grannys is offline   Reply With Quote