View Single Post
Old
02-24-2011, 03:00 PM
  #307
Prussian_Blue
Registered User
 
Prussian_Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Country: Germany
Posts: 7,408
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kdb209 View Post
Your impression is indeed not correct.

There is no prohibition against trading or waiving the player (other than any NTC/NMC the player may have) and no requirement that the player remain on the roster.

There are, however, some add'l waiver requirements before the player can be traded - see below.

And I might pre-preemptively stamp out this common bit of CBA misinformation - if the Blues had put in a claim, they would have had no special priority in claiming Svatos. A team that loses a player on waivers has no special priority in re-claiming the player if he subsequently waived again - waiver priority is always solely based on the standings (either current or past seasons).


Not quite right.

A team can trade a player claimed on waivers (other than under 13.23, the Nabby Rule(*)) without putting them back on waivers - however, they must first offer the player at Waiver price to any team which put in a (lower priority, unsuccessful) claim when he was originally claimed by that team. This restriction is in place for the remainder of the season in which he was claimed.

(*) Article 13.23 supersedes the normal waiver rules and requires clearing full Regular Waivers before a trade.
One gray area, discussed in the Nabby threads, is if a team claims a player under 13.23 and later that season tries to trade him - whether both 13.20(b) & 13.23 are in force or only 13.23 - whether there are two rounds of waivers (the first only for teams with unsuccessful claims) or just one.
Thank you for the clarification.

Prussian_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote