View Single Post
Old
03-14-2011, 01:38 PM
  #22
Habs10Habs
Retired
 
Habs10Habs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 52,735
vCash: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karl Pilkington View Post
This is so dumb. Why wouldn't they continue down the road they are now (favouritism) and thus take into consideration when suspending a player how it will affect the team's suspension record? The NHL is afraid to discipline players, why would #3 make it less scary?

Huh?

5 step plan?? whaa? Like.. why 5 steps? why not 4 or 6? 10? Are they trying to sound smart? Like they have a handle on things?

The NHL has had enough time to come up with plans. How about some action? And I don't mean setting up committees that will discuss which action to take before taken said action. I mean taking action.
Well first you get the committee, then you get the actions. Seems easy enough to understand to me.

As for rule #3, sounds fishy to me too, so we'll see how that one goes.

Habs10Habs is offline   Reply With Quote