View Single Post
Old
03-14-2011, 11:49 PM
  #51
PredsV82
Snot Doc
 
PredsV82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kentucky
Country: Scotland
Posts: 11,322
vCash: 50
nice topic, kudos to all who have posted sensibly on both sides so this thread doesnt get closed/deleted.

Im from KY so I dont have a dog in this specific fight, but I do want to make a comment about a progressive income tax(meaning, a higher percentage is taken from higher incomes)

regardless of whether you believe a progressive tax is "fair"(which is a point of debate and by no means a "settled" question) it is absolutely a fact that a progressive tax is a disincentive to working harder and earning more.

For instance, if your family income is $69,000 or less, your federal tax rate is $15%, and you would owe $10,350 in taxes, for an net income of $58,650 . However if you busted your butt and made an extra $5,000, your $74,000 income would be taxed at 25% and thus you would owe $18,500 in taxes for a net income of $55,500.

How crazy is that??


A flat tax rate would not be a disincentive to productivity. A slightly less attractive alternative is a progressive tax but the higher rate only applies to the dollars in the bracket itself, Thus in the example above the taxpayer would pay 15% of the $69,000 and then pay 25% of the extra 5K. Its not perfect, but it doesnt go back and take more from the first dollar

looking forward to other comments on this

PredsV82 is online now   Reply With Quote