: Confirmed with Link:
Rangers agree to terms with Dylan McIlrath
View Single Post
03-16-2011, 06:24 PM
Join Date: Mar 2006
Originally Posted by
Fitzy Duke of NY
Not liking this signing, and heres why...
We don't need him in the NHL next year. We likely don't expect him to be. Not only do we lose compensation, but
Zipay says we are at 49 contracts right now with the addition of McIlrath and Bourque. using
as a resource, we can see that when our UFAs are gone, including
that takes us down to 43, assuming we don't re-sign any of them. Then assume we don't re-up rfas
and we are at 39. Buy out Drury or retirement gives us 38. Our prospects we would want to sign include
And include Richards or other UFA additions. We may have to be somewhat conservative with signing late round prospects this year.
No worries. McIlrath doesn't count as one of the 50.
"Age 18 and age 19 Players who were returned to Juniors, and who have not played 11 NHL Games in one season, shall be exempt from inclusion in the 50 Player limit." From Article 1 of the CBA - definition of "Reserve List."
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by azrok22