View Single Post
03-22-2011, 08:24 PM
johnjm22's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Barstow, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,503
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by cnshockey View Post
We got Modin that cheap because he was always injured and Colombus wanted to shed salary and give Modin a chance to actually play somewhere. Believe he was actually free, much like Sturm. The 7th was conditional on us winning the cup. Any defenseman that we would get at that value would be around the skill level of Randy Jones or Brett Lebda.
You're supporting my argument.

Originally Posted by cnshockey View Post
I'd much rather have Whiskey or Harrold. Both are accustomed to our style and get along well with the guys in our locker room. Trading for a defenseman would show no faith in either of them and both are competent defenseman. Plus, name one team that carries 9 dmen. I'm perfectly happy with our defensive depth and don't see any reason why we should have wasted any assets on obtaining another one.
The organization has already showed no faith in them by not playing them. Obviously the Kings wouldn't carry 9 defenseman if a depth defenseman was acquired.

johnjm22 is offline   Reply With Quote