View Single Post
Old
04-03-2011, 04:57 PM
  #106
HowdyHowden93*
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 633
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinlandPanther View Post
we didn't need fowler, we have kulikov. fowler will put up more points probably, but kulikov will be the better defenseman. It's scary how good kulikov is at 20 years old. his hockey sense if off the charts and his defense for an offensive D is unreal. yesterday when he was playing with callahan i saw him make the plays by himself to neutralize threats because we obviously know callahan is useless. kulikov, gudbranson >>> kulikov fowler. it would be redundant to have fowler and kulikov.
That is true, Kulikov is our version of Flower. At 20, yes, Kulikov is a stud.

lol I agree, Callahan is useless. Who do you see on D next year?

Kulikov/Garrison/Gudy/Ellerby/Weaver/Wilson? ?? ?? ??

HowdyHowden93* is offline