View Single Post
Old
04-05-2011, 06:19 PM
  #43
eaglesmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Analyzer View Post
Cam Fowler plays as a 4th forward. Defensively weak and physically weak. McIlrath's upside is better than Fowler can dream. However, Fowler is more likely (actually, a lot more likely) to reach it than McIlrath.

McIlrath could be a guy with a big shot, a mean streak and be a great shutdown d.

Fowler is a points guy. Someone you don't want to put out against the other team's top players.

Pretty much McIlrath could be a lesser Chara.
Fowler can be a lesser Green.
The point of my post was to say that its impossible to predict where a player will go in the draft so making comments like player X will not be there at our pick, so we should not speak of him is a bit of a waste, unless its a for sure top 5 pick like RNH or Larsson.

If you want to argue about Mcilrath, fine.
Does he have a big shot? Yup
Does he hit hard? Yup
Does he have a good first pass? Nope
Can he handle the puck? Nope (I remember reading Mckeen's magazine who described his puckhandling as: "he handles the puck like its a live hand grenade")
How's his skating? Meh
Hockey sense? Sub-par
Could he become a lesser Chara? Anything is possible I suppose.

A player can add muscle. A player can learn defensive positioning(ask Pk). What a player can't learn is talent or poise. And when it comes down to it Fowler is miles ahead in both skill and poise with the puck then is Mcilrath.

eaglesmaster is offline