View Single Post
04-07-2011, 05:08 PM
Registered User
jarek's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 8,745
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Cognition View Post
I support TDMM's view in this.

Players exist in a particular context when they play hockey. Role players are in fact used effectively by teams, and if Holmstrom can have a certain value to a team by fulfilling a specific role, that determines his value, regardless of whether some kind of floating abstract system that weights all attributes equally would give him a lower numerical rating. The purpose of a player is to help his team win, not acquire a broad portfolio of skills.
Where would you rank Holmstrom, all-time, as a PP net presence?

jarek is offline   Reply With Quote