View Single Post
08-09-2005, 09:21 AM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Originally Posted by
I think the KEY difference is premeditation, isn't it? But premeditation, from what i would expect, would have been for Bertuzzi to fight Moore. NOT to seriously injure Moore. Anyone who thinks Bertuzzi premediated the "attack" is not thinking correctly.
Steve Moore had already fought Matt Cooke in that game, so Moore had already paid his dues whether the original hit on Naslund was dirty or not.
As much as I like the Canucks, the fact that the Canucks lost that game 9-2
tells you where the heads of some of the guys on the team were at.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by GKJ