View Single Post
04-20-2011, 10:36 AM
LA Kings
Sydor25's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: North Texas
Country: United States
Posts: 21,859
vCash: 500
Send a message via ICQ to Sydor25
Originally Posted by TonySCV View Post
At the time the fans were screaming loudest for a timeout to be called, Smyth scored goal 5. It would have been a terrible time to use it then in retrospect. That goal may have never come.

The Kings had three 2 minute long TV timeouts and it didn't change a thing. I seriously doubt that an additional 30 second timeout wouldn't have changed anything either given the complexion of the game and what was happening on the ice. Their only real chance to salvage what was happening was to get to an intermission.

After the intermission, the Kings got back to what works for them. They just didn't score first.
With that logic, the game would have been won by the Kings 4-3. No problem with a 4-3 win. The Kings didn't need the 5th goal, they just needed to stop the Sharks from scoring.

No one is saying that a timeout would have resulted in a win for the Kings, but at least the coach would be trying something that he has at his disposal. The Sharks used their timeout and changed goalies to spark their team.

Which coach's team won the game? The one that did nothing or the one that tried something?

Sydor25 is offline   Reply With Quote