View Single Post
04-21-2011, 07:15 AM
Registered User
truebluegoalie's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,239
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
The original poster clearly blames the refs and says it was fixed.

Others have agreed that the refs hurt the Rangers, and if you think there would be a peep today about poor refs if the Rangers had won, you are seriously mistaken.

When fans endlessly complain about refs after a win, I'll take some money from my money tree and distribute it.
I said MOST, not ALL. Reading comprehension FAIL.

And I'll take some money because after the 1-0 Boston win I said they were lucky to get that win because on that goal there were at least two plays that should have led to whistles and canceled out that goal.

Originally Posted by NYR89 View Post
Why can't some people comprehend Lundqvist never had the puck covered and under control. That wasn't a bad call, it was the right call.
That isn't really the issue. The issue is that when the same exact play happened at the other end (twice in the series) the whistle was blown much faster.

Again its all about consistency, if the other goalie is getting those calls the Rangers should be getting them as well. That doesn't seem unreasonable to me.

truebluegoalie is offline   Reply With Quote