View Single Post
04-21-2011, 11:29 AM
dialed in your mom
etherialone's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Ether
Country: United Nations
Posts: 12,990
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by JT Dutch View Post
... Moulson never really got much of a shot to show what he could do. Purcell was played out of position and was getting just 10-11 minutes a game to boot; again, not much of a shot.

Frolov had arguably his best season playing for Murray in 08-09, where he was the Kings' best forward. He likely would have done the same in 09-10 if he hadn't been used primarily on a defensive line, and hadn't seen his ice time on the PP (and his overall ice time) decline a minute and a half per game.

It was less about the system with those three, and more about the fact that Murray didn't want to play Moulson and Purcell all too much - and (in my view) chose, along with the GM, to sabotage Frolov in order to decrease his market value.
I agree with this 100%^

etherialone is offline   Reply With Quote