Arthur Staple-Wolski will be bought out
View Single Post
04-25-2011, 06:42 PM
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Danbury, CT
Originally Posted by
Said it at the time, even though everyone else was going crazy about the trade. This was a bad trade. Team was flying with the mix we had, although we had to deal with the injuries at the moment. Rozy was one of our defensemen who could actually pass the puck out of the back end instead of just throwing it up the boards.
Instead, we were stuck watching Gilroy and McCabe out there on our 3rd pairing when it could have been someone like Rozy.
Wolski was one of our better players during the playoffs but it's clear he doesn't do the little things that Torts wants if he's going to be bought out.
No it was an excellent trade
, even if he has to be bought out. You don't think that Sather considered that Wolski is under 26 years old and therefore subject to 1/3 of the cap hit if bought out than 2/3 Roszival would have? Sather damn well knows that stuff. If Wolski played great, you keep him, if not then you saved tons of money. GMs look for other things than their on ice performance, the whole CBA factors into these decisions.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TrollololBoyle