View Single Post
Old
05-05-2011, 09:05 AM
  #3
phillyfanatic
Registered User
 
phillyfanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,631
vCash: 500
Other. I agreed with Boucher game 3 against Buffalo. I disagreed with going Leighton at all after playing the whole year in the AHL. I agreed with pulling Bouch against Buffalo, I agreed with pulling Leighton, I agreed with giving Boucher the ball after Leighton (since the kid was mentally not ready, apparently).

Against Boston, how can we blame the coach? Boucher has been awful, Bob has been OK but nothing outstanding. I thought he should have left Bob in after the hand injury, but I don't disagree with putting Boucher back in. I thought Bob should have started last night and definitely should have been in after goal 2, but semantics.

Summary:
1. It is the goalies fault
2. Our team defense has not been the goalie savior it was last year. No insulation means leaky crappy goalie(s)
3. It is not the coaches fault
4. The Flyers quit, but only after they saw as we did....they had no chance to win with Boucher in net. I would have quit too.

phillyfanatic is offline   Reply With Quote