View Single Post
Old
05-07-2011, 07:25 PM
  #37
BlueshirtBlitz
Rich Nash
 
BlueshirtBlitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 18,580
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rangers32185 View Post
My point is, Lundqvist is going nowhere, Biron is signed on another year. Wouldn't you rather develop a young goalie than see a 28 year old guy playing down there? With the way contracts are so precious for us I don't see the need to sign Fasth. I guess this is a agree to disagree case here.
I see what you're saying but if Fasth is good and doesn't mind playing in HFD, he gives our guys in the minors a better chance to win, and "growing up" in a winning environment is good, and he can always be called up to backup Henke instead of Chad Johnson.

BlueshirtBlitz is offline   Reply With Quote