The GM debate
View Single Post
05-10-2011, 04:31 PM
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington DC
It's now clear that Leonsis answers to McPhee, not the other way around.
I understand this is from ESPN and it is of course not our favorite source of hockey information but it does state the facts.
McPhee was hired in 1997 the first year the Verizon Center was opened, and earned a trip with to the Stanley Cup finals where the Capitals were swept in his rookie season as Caps GM. Since then McPhee has been through a firesale and rebuild, since the Lockout the Capitals have made the postseason 4 times and have never advanced past the second round, most recently being swept by division rival and lower seed Tampa Bay.
Since 1997 McPhee has hired Ron Wilson, Bruce Cassidy, Glen Hanlon, and Bruce Boudreau. None of the coaches had won a Stanley Cup nor have they won a Stanley Cup since leaving the Capitals. Two out of the four coaches are currently not in the NHL.
It's become increasingly clear over the years that Leonsis takes his orders from McPhee, not the other way around. Despite ruining the team after the Stanley Cup and failing to make a sustained postseason run since the lockout McPhee's job has never been in question.
Leonsis is all too comfortable with the losing culture that has surrounded the Washington Capitals since their inception in the seventies. As long as the seats are being filled and the money is coming in things are going exactly as they should be, everything is going according to plan. Winning is not and has not ever been in this franchise's vocabulary and there is no action being taken to change this. Leonsis is afraid to take action when action is necessary, the sign of a weak and inefficient leader that would be terminated or posted in almost any other profession. Nobody wants to question the man who signs the checks, and our GM, the one man who has some capacity to, as it seems owns the man.
View Public Profile
Robert Theodorson's albums
Find More Posts by Robert Theodorson