View Single Post
05-29-2011, 08:22 AM
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 14,757
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by broadwayblue View Post
Why not just trade #15, #45 and a player to Minnesota for #10??? It's hard enough to pull off 1 trade and you have us moving up twice. lol
Because Minnesota doesn't have two first round picks. Why would they want to drop from 10 to 15?

Colorado has two first round picks. #2 and #11.

Minnesota may not have an issue dropping down one spot.

If our guy is there, why wouldn't we pay that price? Why settle for a lesser player when a high-end player could be had 5 spots ahead of where we are supposed to pick at #15.

Rangers themselves said its a 10 pick first round that drops off after the top 10.

If the opportunity is there to get into the top 10 without sacrificing a top prospect, any future picks, or any NHL core players, we should do it.

I doubt Minnesota would move that far down.

Colorado is our best bet for an initial trade partner. From #11 things are more manageable.

SupersonicMonkey* is offline