View Single Post
Old
06-02-2011, 11:34 AM
  #33
macavoy
Registered User
 
macavoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston, Tx
Country: United States
Posts: 7,580
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Goalie Mask View Post
Actually I don't think you understand my point. Let me explain it to you a different way.

He's to old and slow and for a depth dmen his contract is to expensive. So trying to move him at the right time is a wise move to create space for better potential dmen that our part of our long term plan.

IF we could of moved Spacek at the trade deadline(which would of been fine because the Stanley wasn't coming our way), it would of made it easier for Gauthier to sign Wiz which I think he should (smart move for the long term plan).
Why would a contending team take on Spacek's contract for next year? If you were Boston or Vancouver's GM, would you want Spacek's contract hand cuffing you next year and hurting your chances at the cup the next year?

If you were a GM of those teams, would you really trade for Spacek?

macavoy is offline   Reply With Quote