View Single Post
10-17-2003, 07:04 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 85
vCash: 500
As always, thank you for those great little extra insights, Guy.

Does the Video Judge in Edmonton have the best possible video equipment available to review disputed goals? On television, it looked like the puck probably did completely cross the goal line, but the glove plus the angle of the camera shots we saw could leave just a very, very tiny amount of wriggle room to make the "inconclusive" judgement.

I also thought that Buffalo got the benefit of the doubt with no penalty shot being called. While a player can redirect the puck with his hand and glove, I thought the Buffalo player could have been called for closing his hand around the puck.

HarryStrand is offline