Thread: Dan Girardi
View Single Post
Old
06-08-2011, 12:46 PM
  #56
JeffMangum
I'm v
 
JeffMangum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Listening to music
Country: United States
Posts: 58,391
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orr Nightmare View Post
I would agree with that..he is a #3 but when paired with a #1 he is an adequate #2.

So, a team like Colorado who is needs a dman in the worst way would offer David Jones up for Giradi.

See, that is a deal that makes sense...Giradi for David Jones.
That's actually not too bad...I'd do that, but Jones has a pretty lengthy injury history, so I would hesitate if it was straight up. That's probably because Jones is one of my favorite non-Rangers, though.

And I would not do that THIS offseason. Can't trade Girardi now unless we get an upgrade back.

__________________
Soon.

Last edited by JeffMangum: 06-08-2011 at 12:47 PM. Reason: Added sentence.
JeffMangum is offline   Reply With Quote