View Single Post
06-27-2011, 07:00 PM
Talks to Goalposts
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,585
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by Miller Time View Post
not a GM in his right mind that would give up his #1 prospect for a player who had massively underperformed for 2 consecutive seasons... at least not one who understands the impact of a cap on managing a roster.
I object to McDonagh being called the #1 prospect. That may have been where he was ranked by Hockey Future but at the time Subban and maybe also Pacioretty were regarded by many as better, which is reflected by where each of the three are now. Not that McDonagh isn't a solid future D-man, but I think your use of that term to describe him is misleading.

Talks to Goalposts is offline   Reply With Quote