HFBoards - View Single Post - Line Combos: If we get Richards, our first line LW should be Dubinsky

SouthJerseyRanger · 06-29-2011, 11:06 AM

Why the hell is everyone so eager to break up the Pack Line? When they were together they were easily putting up top line-type numbers... often times playing against the opposition's top defensive pair. In my mind they are two lines you don't break up.

Dubinsky - Anisimov - Callahan

Fedotenko - Boyle - Prust

both of these lines were fantastic last year. Keep Stepan with Zucca, put Richards with Gaborik, and fill in the other 2 spots with a combination of Avery, Wolski, Christensen, or a FA pickup or trade.

I see no reason to mess with 2 forward units that showed fantastic chemistry and played great 2 way hockey... especially when neither is projected to be your top scoring line.

06-29-2011, 11:06 AM	#85
SouthJerseyRanger Registered User Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: South Jersey Country: Posts: 666 vCash: 500	Why the hell is everyone so eager to break up the Pack Line? When they were together they were easily putting up top line-type numbers... often times playing against the opposition's top defensive pair. In my mind they are two lines you don't break up. Dubinsky - Anisimov - Callahan Fedotenko - Boyle - Prust both of these lines were fantastic last year. Keep Stepan with Zucca, put Richards with Gaborik, and fill in the other 2 spots with a combination of Avery, Wolski, Christensen, or a FA pickup or trade. I see no reason to mess with 2 forward units that showed fantastic chemistry and played great 2 way hockey... especially when neither is projected to be your top scoring line.