Thread: Stamkos
View Single Post
Old
07-04-2011, 11:46 AM
  #95
broadwayblue
Registered User
 
broadwayblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 16,091
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardsRngrs View Post
I brought this up earlier but my thread was Closed
12-12-12-12-10-9-8-7-6-5=93M/10yrs 9.3M Cap Hit
I think this is the ballpark for a straight Force Majeur Non Matchable Offer Sheet and you give up the Picks
(they don't match because it is too much $ and they already have big hits to Cap with Lecavalier and St. Louis)
OR
Sign and trade but probably Stamkos gets 8-8.5M for at least 6 yrs
but you have to give up Player(s) you don't want to.

I think the Rangers should step away at this point.
Don't get me wrong...93M over 10 years is hardly a bad deal. But, Stamkos would only be earning 7M, 6M and 5M each season as a 28, 29 and 30 year old. Not exactly a ton of cash for a superstar right in his prime. I wonder if a 19 year deal would be better? lol

broadwayblue is offline   Reply With Quote