View Single Post
Old
07-05-2011, 08:32 AM
  #23
GardinerExpressway
Registered User
 
GardinerExpressway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Sydney, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 325
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorade View Post
An arbitrator would give him around 4.5M so you have to think his agent is not going to leave 1M+ on the table for his client. So Burke will have to pay up or offer a long term deal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bullet Proof View Post
Yeah, but who do u think is the better player between him and Upshall? if Upshall got 4mil/per then I absolutely think MacArthur deserves at least that much for lets say 2 years.
Evidence of UFA signings is inadmissible in the arbitration process. There's no way he'd be given a judgement as high as 4.5 per. There was a poster the other day that put up some really great comparables in terms of RFAs coming off of breakout years and the consensus seems to be an award of anywhere from 3 to 3.8 (max).

The real problem with letting him go to arbitration is that we then only have him under contract for one year and at the end he's a UFA (26 y/o) which, if he turns out to be the real deal, could cost us some serious coin a season from now. Maybe it's better to give the better term, say 3 years, and eat up a few of his UFA years at a lower hit ... something like the above posters are thinking in the Grabovski range.

GardinerExpressway is offline