View Single Post
07-09-2011, 10:20 AM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Originally Posted by
I mean both sides could use some more quality depth, but the Rangers are much better off on the LW then the RW.
I see your point..but I look at it like this:
On the right:
Gabby/Cally/Thomas....but Gabby and Cally are one hell of a 1-2...we might need some more potential guys for when Gabby gets older, but for the next few years RW isn't a need.
On the left:
Dubi/Krieder/Miller...That's it. And Krieder/Miller aren't ready. So this is why LW is more of an immediate need, though we might be fine in a few years depending on how the 2 prospects do.
So right now we need LWs...moving forward that'll probably change to needing RWs(next few drafts should plan for this).
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by NYRangers16