View Single Post
Old
07-11-2011, 12:43 PM
  #70
seventieslord
Moderator
 
seventieslord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,708
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iain Fyffe View Post
"Best" is not a constant. If Paton is 100% better than his closest competition, that can put him above a 1905 goalie who's 50% better than his closest competition. Just pulling some numbers to make the point, of course.
Well, yes, I agree. I mean, it's for this reason that Orr is undoubtedly better than someone like Lidstrom despite playing in the watered-down 70s, and for me it is a big reason why Harvey is also surely better.

Proving Paton to actually be that percentage better, is much harder than it would be for a player like Orr or Harvey though.

Quote:
You have an awfully narrow definition of "contemporaries" then.
I'm puzzled. If those two players played a combined one season with/against Paton, why would I call them his contemporaries?

seventieslord is online now