Thread: Thomas Hickey
View Single Post
Old
07-16-2011, 01:12 PM
  #49
northernKing
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,838
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telos View Post
One interesting thing about Hickey and our first round picks is that when Dean was hired, he was championing a platform of building through the draft and was pointing at our drafting history of how our first round picks mostly never played for LA and a lot of the picks or prospects were either traded before they could show what they could do or they would bust and not play in the NHL.

It's a little funny because Dean has made 7 first round selections out of 8 possible picks (Bernier, Lewis, Hickey, Doughty, Teubert, Schenn, and Forbort), and only 3 of those players (Doughty, Bernier, and Lewis) has played for the Kings, and only one (Doughty) is the primary in his role and looks to have a long-term future with the organization at this point (outside of the most recent Forbort who is still unknown). But it is still a little interesting that three of those players/picks (Teubert, Schenn, 2011 1st) were traded and four of those players (Forbort) either never will or have yet to play a game for the Kings.

I am sure this is the whole foundation of the local pessimist/anti-Dean argument, but it is a little amusing to see that he campaigned on a platform of developing internally and utilizing those firsts, making fun of the Pagnutti and Jokinen picks, and less than 50% of his picks have been kept or has done anything for us.

Not that I am complaining, I love the way things turned out, just an interesting note.
Pagnutti? I agree with your post and IMO the Richards deal is like Dave Taylors deal for Palffy. Both GM's saw a chance to bring in a NHL star and sacrifice a top young prospect Jokinen/Schenn

northernKing is offline   Reply With Quote