Unproven but huge potential > proven stars?
View Single Post
07-23-2011, 08:25 AM
Join Date: Nov 2005
Originally Posted by
Most people in here say, Homer does the right things.
So you guys think in general, that an unproven huge potential player worth more than a proven impact player?
Most people who understand hockey think Homer is a colossal **** up.
An unproven player is an unproven player is an unproven player. Until we see them consistently for 4-5 years they are still question marks, while Richards and Carter both proved to be excellent players on a consistent basis.
To the person who said Schenn and Couturier shouldn't be allowed near the media, sorry, I disagree. The media contributed heavily to Richards' trade and these new guys shouldn't be sheltered. Let them jump into the fire and see what it's like.
Btw did anyone else see the quote from Homer in the latest issue of the Hockey News? Something along the lines of "I don't know if we got better but we got different.". Makes me sooo confident in the job he and Snider did.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by MsWoof