View Single Post
07-26-2011, 02:42 PM
Registered User
TheDevilMadeMe's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Country: United States
Posts: 46,047
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by seventieslord View Post
Well, that's not entirely true nor is it an entirely valid concern

First of all, Brent and Brian are clearly better, no one will disagree about that.

Ron is a poor man's 3rd/4th line center in the ATD so I personally think he warrants selection earlier than McKay. But if you're that high on McKay that think he should go back up to ATD 4th lines where he started, then this one can be considered debatable too.

Poor Dwayne has unfortunately become the punch line of ATD statements about mediocre players lately. He will see his stock fall next year, deservedly so. Will he fall past McKay? Should he? I'm open to arguments there.

Darryl should probably not be picked before McKay. But he usually isn't, either. (there was a streak of 4 drafts - 8 to 11 - where he was selected an average of 384 slots after McKay)

**** should definitely not be picked before McKay. But he never is.
Obviously, Brent and Brian were much, much better players than McKay. Ron was quite a bit better too at his peak.

I don't see any substantial difference between McKay and Duane. If anything, McKay seems to have been a bigger part of his championship teams than Duane was. When I criticized the Duane Sutter pick in the ATD, it's because I knew I could get someone at least as good 600+ picks later or whenever McKay usually goes.

By the way, I gave you feedback on the "re-do" idea via PM, because you asked me specifically via PM.

Last edited by TheDevilMadeMe: 07-26-2011 at 03:09 PM.
TheDevilMadeMe is offline   Reply With Quote