Thread: Larry Brooks: Bluebloods took less to remain NYR
View Single Post
Old
07-31-2011, 12:17 PM
  #19
ruckus*
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 3,554
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueshirtBlitz View Post
Maybe i'm thinking about BR then. I know he said something about one of the contracts but I can't remember.

I'm actually thinking it was about Arty, now.

Yeah it was Arty.



Alright then, carry on.
He was initially skeptical on the Richards signing as well, and then changed his tune a day or two later.

"So it turns out the issue wasnít so much whether I agreed with Glen Sather and Jim Dolan on the deal the Rangers gave Brad Richards, but whether I agreed with myself.
Yes (or no), thatís correct. I did not want the Rangers to become enmeshed in a bidding war for No. 19. I did not want the Rangers to repeat their sins of the past by bribing a marquee athlete to wear the crest (while being careful never to step on it in the room). I did not want the team to give Richards longer than five years.
But itís clear this wasnít bribery that led to a shotgun wedding; this was a marriage. Richards left money on the table to sign. He did not attempt to shake every nickel loose. I had proposed five years at $6.5 million per. Essentially it is six years at $6.67 million per."


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/sports/range...#ixzz1ThU3QenC

ruckus* is offline   Reply With Quote