View Single Post
Old
08-14-2011, 06:38 PM
  #32
ColonialsHockey10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,426
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbeck5 View Post
If you make an argument, it's probably best to explain why...or else it's a piss poor argument. I don't know why wanting an explanation on a off the map pick is jumping the gun so much that you had to chime in. Isn't it completely normal to want an explanation? All he had to to was was explain his pick like most good posters on here do. Why are you crying about it?
Are you his other username? For christs sake, the guy said Brodin, he responded by saying he had lost his credibility, and I said that was a little over the top. You are correct, it is completely normal to want an explanation. Telling someone they lost all credibility is the complete opposite end of the spectrum, however. Can you differentiate between the two? Seems like you're crying about it.

Off the map pick? Brodin was picked 10th overall, ahead of both Erixon and Rundblad in their perspective draft years, and slightly behind OEL. It's not like he said some swedish no name, Brodin's a blue chip prospect.

ColonialsHockey10 is offline   Reply With Quote