Let's Talk LW Trade Options
View Single Post
08-17-2011, 02:44 PM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Originally Posted by
I probably woudlnt give him up for a second. It would probably take a first, because if we do get to the point where Grabo is being dealt, there will be more than one team interested.
That being said, from the Rangers, Id consider 1st + Wolski if it meant that we could also include one of the rangers better prospects in the deal.
For Grabovski? Probably not. He would be pretty much strictly a rental. Why give up a 1st in a VERY deep draft, Wolski who has scored 60 points before and one of the teams better prospects for 2 months of a player who you aren't sure if he will fit in or not.
He is a good player, but he isn't that good. We aren't talking Sundin or Iginla or Hossa.
Kovalchuk got a 1st, an NHL defenseman who was overpaid (Oduya) and Bergfors who floundered and did practically nothing for Atlanta.
Hossa got Christensen, Armstrong, a washed up 1st rounder + 1st.
Grabovski is not getting Wolski + Higher end prospect + 1st.
You would be looking at a 2nd.
View Public Profile
NYR Viper's albums
Find More Posts by NYR Viper