View Single Post
Old
08-26-2011, 12:08 PM
  #53
seventieslord
Moderator
 
seventieslord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,701
vCash: 500
won't have much time to say more than this, so this is sort of a "closing argument".

Looking at my team, although it stands up well in all areas (Cook and Erixon were top vote getters at their positions and Nicholson was 3rd) and the team as a whole was defended well from some of the less-than-fair comparisons made here, it's not really goaltending, forwards, or coaching that makes this a Regina victory. It's the defense. Let's review the norris/all-star finishes earned by all the defensemen in each top-6 (top-15 only, must be more than one vote, in years where norris/AS were both earned, only higher placement counts)

5th
5th
5th
7th
7th
8th
8th
8th
8th
9th
9th
9th
10th
11th
12th
13th
13th

red = New New York.
black = Regina.

it's not really close.

And Regina didn't just grab a bunch of "stars" without the skills to back it up. This is a big, strong, tough, physical and defensive corps of defensemen. I think it does lack in PP ability. But with that said, it's not horrible offensively, either. Here are the instances of 50% or more versus the league's #2 scoring defenseman, with Orr and Coffey removed as obvious outliers:

* = WHA converted at 0.67 exchange rate

Roberts: 66, 62, 58, 55, 52*, 52*, 51
Sargent: 68, 60, 52
Gibbs: 64, 64, 53
Kampman: 54
Portland: N/A
Armstrong: N/A

Guevremont: 89, 79, 72, 66
Souray: 96, 83, 65, 55
Seabrook: 76
Godfrey: 54
Hedican: N/A
Quinn: N/A

They may give way to some other defense corps in offense, but not this one. And they don't give way to any of them in overall ability.

Defense FTW!


Last edited by seventieslord: 08-26-2011 at 03:15 PM.
seventieslord is online now   Reply With Quote