View Single Post
Old
10-24-2003, 07:54 AM
  #14
Davisian
Registered User
 
Davisian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 6,079
vCash: 500
Well SCREW you two!!! These are my imaginary lines thank you!!!!

Alas, I see your point, but I liked the way those three played together last year, didn't seem useless to me and they just seem like they'd be a good change of pace from the Nedved line..

Also, configure it any way you like, but I firmly believe that Lindros is more effective on the wing at this point in his career..

And I'd agree on Ruchinsky/Hlavac and I'd include Carter in that bunch.. If this team really is going to dedicate itself to a tight checking team, I think there's already enough talent there with Nedved, Kovalev etc. that makes only two out of those three a need.. I'd lose one of them, package them with Malakhov and see what can come this way..


Ideally, say Hlavac is dealt (I don't care if its Ruchinsky either)

Go;

Ruchinsky Nedved Kovalev

Barnaby Moore Lindros

LaCouture Holik Lundmark

Simon Messier Carter

Gives Moore a spot to succeed, and spreads the talent around..

I think I just saw a pig fly by my window..

Davisian is offline