View Single Post
Old
09-12-2011, 06:42 PM
  #81
SouthernHab
Registered User
 
SouthernHab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,018
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blind Gardien View Post
I'd be satisfied with standing pat *IF* management had already approached some of the likely candidates out there, but determined that those players didn't want to play for us (on the kinds of terms I'd be thinking of, that is). We have $5M in cap space with openings up front and on D. Guys like Madden, Winchester, McCabe even, Hannan before he evapourated, etc, etc, all the usual suspects... if you could have any 2 of them on 1-year deals and still have $3M+ in cap space free for all this deadline contingency usage that people are talking about... shouldn't it be a no-brainer? $3M still gets you any player in the league at the deadline.

I'll just assume that Gauthier approached a variety of these players, but found that they either didn't want to come to Montreal, or didn't want 1-year sub-$1M deals, or some such. C'est la vie.

I'm a little surprised that so many people are so sold on the deadline acquisition issue, however. What if:
a) Habs aren't looking like a contender at the deadline, or
b) Habs don't make a significant acquisition at the deadline, or
c) Habs feel some kind of internal pressure to make a significant acquisition at the deadline and in so doing make a terrible trade for a player who ends up not making a difference and gives up some of the youth elements that are so cherished around here in the process...

Etc. Then what was the cap space good for? It's all what-ifs. I would always rather see the team spend the money up front in a clear attempt to make the team better from Day 1.

Best post on this thread.

There really is not that much that PG can go out and get right now. It would be foolish to just bring on some semi-washed up player.

However, that money should have been spent in July when there were players available who could have helped this team.

We have a very good team. The problem is that for this team to remain very good is that we have to avoid the injuries since our depth is not that solid.

Being proactive is far better than being reactive. Also, if PG is hoping that this team is in position to make the playoffs and he will spend then, this could be a recipe for disaster if we are not due to injuries.

I give PG a and a for not addressing our needs in July.

SouthernHab is offline   Reply With Quote