Pros and Cons of the Bruins
View Single Post
10-24-2003, 04:12 PM
Join Date: Feb 2002
Originally Posted by
I think something is being lost in the communication. I'm not advocating veterans over the youths - not right now anyways. The Bruins need to see what these guys can do, including Hilbert, Zinovjev and maybe even Morrisonn and Jurcina. Now is the time to experiment.
However, come February, the Bruins should know whether they have answered their questions. And therein lies the rub. As of now, I think the Bruins have more parts than pieces. Whether that will have changed by then remains to be seen, but if not, the Damphousses of the world could be the right fit to nullify any potential weakness that could be exploited in the playoffs.
It's not lost on me the potential of the youth. For instance, there is a distinct possibility that Bergeron could end up as the second line center we need. I am skeptical with him being 18 and not quite physically mature, but if he was clicking with Samsonov, then the B's may have answered an important question. Whether Patrice could stand up in the playoffs is a different story, but if playing him meant the B's had a chance to balanced out their attack rather than carrying a potentially deadly flaw, then if he was truly ready, I'd rather get him the experience -- even if he wilted under pressure -- than acquire other players or have a weakness such as in year's past.
As far as Hilbert and Zinovjev, they are considerably behind the eight ball. This may be a "development" season for them instead of the contributory one Bergeron is having. To that end, I am a bit more suspect on their real impact on the Bruins issues.
Again, when looking at the bigger picture, if the Bruins want to compete come the playoffs, they have to know what they've got. The players have to fit together so there's balance and minimal weakness. As of now, the Bruins have many parts but not necessarily the right pieces. This is evident on the second line, where Samsonov is playing with two glorified muckers, and on the defense, where the size and strength are dominant but mobility and skill are largely void. I'm not sure the youth can answer these questions. Perhaps to a degree, especially in Bergeron's case, but the B's may have to look elsewhere if they want the best chance. That's where the veteran acquisitions come in.
So yeah, let the youth play, see if they can answer the call, but be prepared that they may not. Beyond that, if the Broons want to assure their competitiveness come the playoffs, they should be honest with themselves about what they have and take sensible steps to address any shortcomings. As long as it's not costly (ie no top prospects), such strategically placed additions to the could mean the difference between making the finals and entertaining their next early exit. See where I'm coming from??
agreed. Because MOC is 'probably' feeling a bit more pressure than last year (remember Harris article after the draft that said the Broons front office were dead man walking) he'll certainly go add a piece if he has to. Last year it was McGillis as a pretty big addition (imo it was just that); If MOC has to give up a Huml or maybe even a Hilbert- depending on how Bergeron and Zinovjev are doing for a short termer who can put them over the hump or solidify their position I absolutely 100 % believe he'll do it in a heartbeat.
I'd even go so far as to say unless the Broons are cruising along at top 3 spots and 15 points ahead of last playoff team, I expect them to do just that. A Daze, Scott Young, someone along those lines could be targeted- but its 40 games or a serious injury away.
I want to see the 'Zino Kid' for several games before any move is made.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by DKH