View Single Post
Old
09-23-2011, 10:06 AM
  #852
Rexor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brno
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 864
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanSciver View Post
My conclusions are based on logic and reason. Your reply here is another example of how your statements lack logic, in that you didn't take into account Jagr's age, in Jagr "producing in Jagr terms"

Just as there is zero logic in saying that you can with 110% conviction say that Crosby, Ovechkin, or Malkin wouldn't lead the KHL is scoring
Logic? I thought you were here only to talk hockey, and nothing else?
Well, then:

Quote:
Originally Posted by VanSciver View Post
It's not realistic to think he'll be able to play at the same level as he did in his prime. Have you read any credible NHL source who beleives that Jagr can play to that level. That he will challenge for the Art Ross?

If Jagr can play at that level, why weren't more teams interested in him as a player?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum


"In logic, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for 'appeal to the people') is a fallacious argument that concludes a proposition to be true because many or most people believe it; it alleges: 'If many believe so, it is so.'"

Rexor is offline