: Prospect Info:
Further Comments on HF's Rangers Top 20
View Single Post
09-28-2011, 08:47 PM
BoH Mod Only
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Charlotte, NC
Originally Posted by
Agreed. There is no logical reason to have McD at 4. None.
Leslie, for some reason you have never been overly high on McDonagh. But now that he's proven his worth as a NHL d-man, I don't get how you can still not believe in him. It's a little bit bewildering and makes no real sense.
I'm not worried about McD, but he's not actually proven yet after 40 games.
Chad Johnson is way too high on there though.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by Tawnos