View Single Post
Old
10-01-2011, 04:20 PM
  #54
piqued
Registered User
 
piqued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas
Country: United States
Posts: 32,014
vCash: 3722
Vincour had an excellent preseason last year as well and then hardly scored at all in either the AHL or NHL. I'm still of the opinion that he should prove he's able to produce in the AHL first before he makes the team. The fact that he's had another good preseason is nice and encouraging, but ultimately shouldn't make much difference in terms of the make-up of the team if everyone's healthy. Is the team better if Vincour is playing and Petersen isn't? Probably. Is that best for Vincour's long-range development? Probably not.

I don't think the organization is happy with Barch at all. The signing of Godard is proof of that. If Barch didn't have that contract and/or we had an owner it would've been him getting waived.

piqued is offline   Reply With Quote